[ossec-dev] [Bug 52] Proposal to use a hash more secure

[ossec-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

http://www.ossec.net/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=52





------- Comment #7 from jonas.esp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-08-17 07:37 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> * WHIRLPOOL (without doubt the best option but the digest size is of 512)
The main problem of WHIRLPOOL is that is too slow as you can check on
http://www.cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html

So that the best alternative would be RIPEMD-256 that is implemented on Mhash.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.ossec.net/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.