[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ossec-list] Re: Behavior of MS Windows "Agent"
- To: ossec-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ossec-list] Re: Behavior of MS Windows "Agent"
- From: "Daniel Cid" <daniel.cid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 03:55:24 -0300
- Cc: evazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GYBMXUvywIwNiM2IPyxlJwepLqU7OsRyzATDAyPdmSynHl5fsVtJIKlIyFkQfCLIZRDYfZ9jSeaE5c3QmaQtXdjt8i4sCYQyGQ6E1CobUP9+1d+Kal8dHKWSyBL3Evj6fk91KMNNDz7Rc8pn+S4YZsrlk+ED6UtruA+5oyBOPOY=
Hi Ed,
That's very strange... Even when the agent starts and scans the system it should
not use that much CPU. Does this problem goes away after 20/30 minutes?
Are you using version 1.2? There are some ways to reduce the CPU usage on the
agent, but in your case it looks like a different issue...
Thanks,
--
Daniel B. Cid
dcid ( at ) ossec.net
On 5/23/07, Vazquez, Ed <evazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's an odd one for you.
>
> Three different systems.
>
> One running Win2K3 Server on a quad Xeon, one running WinXP Pro x64 on
> a dual Athlon, one running Win2K3 Server x64 on a Core2 Duo.
>
> On all three, the OSSEC agent chewed up _minimum_ of 45% of the CPU
> cycles along with using /accessing lsass and services, accounting for
> the remaining 55%. This lead to 100% CPU utilization on all
> platforms.
>
> Ouch.
>
> Is there some trick to the client that I'm missing?
> Incompatibilities? Further debug data I can provide?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Ed Vazquez
>
> New: It comes in different colors from the previous version.
> 23 May 2007 13:54:40
>
>
OSSEC home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
OSSEC project: www.ossec.net.
Mailling list information: http://www.ossec.net/en/mailing_lists.html.