[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ossec-list] Re: Clients don't work when OSSEC server is in High Availability?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tim,
	I think you need to add a SNAT rule to use iptables for this.  I'm
not in a position to test this but I think something like this may
work for you:
- -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -p udp --dport 1514 -j SNAT --to
xxx.xxx.xxx.29
	The intent (as I said, I can't check this) is to add to the nat
table a postrouting rule for udp output on eth0 to port 1514 that
jumps to source network address translation setting the source
address to be xxx.xxx.xxx.29.
	I hope that at least points you in the right direction.
	-David

Timothy Meader wrote:
> Hello, I'm having an issue that I'm hoping someone could provide me 
> some help on. To give a brief synopsis of the situation:
> 
> We originally had a single server setup running OSSEC. Last week, we 
> decided to combine this server with another two that were running as 
> a simple log server (in high availability fail-over mode using 
> heartbeat) to make better use of the existing systems. The log server 
> portion is running on the virtual IP xxx.xxx.xxx.7 on eth0:0, the 
> OSSEC server is setup to run on a secondary virtual IP, 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.29, on eth0:1. When running on a single server, OSSEC 
> worked fine. But now, the clients refuse to communicate properly with 
> the server.
> 
> Using tcpdump, I tracked this communications problem down to the fact 
> that the server response from OSSEC in the high availability setup is 
> going back to the client with the ACTUAL address of eth0 
> (xxx.xxx.xxx.17 or 18 depending on which of the two high-avail nodes 
> it's currently running on). What I need is for the server response to 
> come back to the client with the xxx.xxx.xxx.29 address as the 
> source. I've investigated the "IPsrcaddr" script that comes with 
> heartbeat, but unfortunately there are two issues that preclude me 
> from using it, so I'm looking to iptables for a means to handle this.
> 
> Basically, I need the responses to any traffic coming in on UDP port 
> 1514 (or, alternatively, to the destination IP x.29) to go back out 
> with a src address of x.29 instead of x.17 or x.18. Is there a method 
> using iptables that can handle this problem? Or barring that, can 
> anyone think of any other means to accomplish this task if iptables 
> can't handle this on its own? Below, I've included the current 
> iptables data rules that the two cluster nodes are presently sharing.
> 
> Thank you in advance for any and all replies up-front.
> 
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
> -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
> -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 514 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 514 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 720 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 
> 1514 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 
> 5514 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 
> 5140 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 
> 8000:8001 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 
> 8089 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
> COMMIT
> 
> ---
> Tim Meader
> L-3 Communications, NASA EOS Security Operations
> Timothy.Meader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (301) 614-6371  
> 

- --
_______________________________________________
GPG (http://www.gnupg.org/) key available from:
http://www.kayakero.net/per/david/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHIK/JCzuSgviBh00RArKUAKCISTPuNn8HsBx194ViEHm1yjgXDwCbBfaB
Tjrzx6xrBw5Fvug4B8KHiRc=
=QxfP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


OSSEC home | Main Index | Thread Index


OSSEC project: www.ossec.net.
Mailling list information: http://www.ossec.net/en/mailing_lists.html.